Capital Accumulation
Noam Chomsky argued that the
rapidity with which children learn language proves that an important part of
our language ability is innate. Particular languages are culture specific, but
we learn them quickly thanks to an in-built language acquisition device, often
abbreviated as LAD in the trade. There are plenty of reasons to think there is
something to this idea of language learning even though it probably goes too
far and not even Chomsky retails the original version these days. What
interests me about Chomsky’s idea here, however, is not its ultimate validity
but the way it was received. Back in the day, as I recall, it seemed revelatory
and also rather obvious to people of my age. I wonder now if it seemed so
obvious to older folks, especially those who had actually raised children; for
even if kids do learn language with remarkable rapidity, parents do spend a
great deal of time teaching them. Parents are rather less likely than 22-year
old grad students to forget about the hundreds of hours of conversations, of
reading out loud, of answering endless questions that go into child care in
middle class American households. It’s easy to think that people learn things
without being taught them if you don’t have to do the teaching. But callow grad
students aren’t the only ones who need to learn this lesson.
Some revelation: you don’t know
things that you haven’t found out about. Sounds more impressive in Latin: Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius in
sensu. Well, one man’s cliché is another’s axiom;
and, to judge from what I often read or rather don’t read in political
speeches, this home truth is still news to many—I guess nobody told ‘em. I’m
not just talking about all those articles about how ignorant kids or people in
general are about geography or history, the ones that imply that we all ought
to be born with information about the location of France and who fought whom in
World War I. The more consequential examples are those in which people blame
whole populations of people for what they don’t know even though they come from
groups that have been systematically prevented or discouraged from learning.
Centuries of effort were required to achieve what we take for granted as the intellectual
patrimony of middle-class people as if it were something in the genes. That
comparable work must be done to achieve the same results for those who were
left out on purpose is somehow scandalous or at least surprising.
Angels have no memory; but neither
do many people, at least when it comes to forgetting the secret of their own
advantage. The essence of conservatism, despite its official respect for
tradition, is a general amnesia, one that allows conservatives to think that
the results of history, often rather recent history at that, are eternal facts.
About cultural capital, it turns out most of us are conservatives. We may laugh
at millionaire politicians who were born on third base and believe they hit a
triple, and yet forget that we ourselves inherited a great many words if not a
great many bucks.
The classic study of the issue,
done back in 1995, found that the children of professional people heard an
average of 45 million words in their first four years while the children of
working class people heard 26 million and the children of welfare recipients
heard 13 million. The lesson often taken from this result is that parents
should be encouraged to talk more to their kids, read to them, encourage their
questions, and so forth. There’s surely nothing wrong with this moral, but
aside from expecting an awful lot from people who are often living close to the
edge, it ignores the fact that a large part of the reason the parents don’t
give enough words to their offspring is that they don’t have that many words
themselves. Almost everybody learns the full grammar of the language they are
born into, even if the dialect they acquire may not be the official version.
The full possession of the resources of a language, however, is a heritage that
grows over generations and requires sustained and costly efforts to foster and
preserve.
Experience is a great substitute
for brains, and culture is a great substitute for experience. Maybe that
accounts in part for the observed fact that so many members of long-standing
elites aren’t particularly bright as individuals. They don’t need to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment