First-Thing-in-the-Morning Thought
The New Atheists
complain when theists insist that their naturalism is itself a kind of
religion, but the problem with modern scientism is precisely that it is not a
religion or rather, since religion isn’t quite the right word, not an
aspirational ideology or value system. The scientists and their commercial and
military employers have made a concerted effort to demystify science, to assure
everybody that the scientists don’t form some sort of priesthood, that their
motives aren’t alien but merely commercial (better living through chemistry) or
at worst patriotic (better bombs through nuclear physics). The originality and
power of science, however, like all the other great human institutions, can not
he explained by its utility, though religious fundamentalists and reactionary
politicians only tolerate it, to the extent they do tolerate it, because they
need the technology it makes possible. I once asked the philosopher Paul Weiss
what God was good for in his system of metaphysics. Weiss answered. “Well. Some
things are good for something and some are good for nothing. God is good for
nothing.” Science is (or was) like that.
It is a commonplace
that the various philosophical schools of antiquity were not simply the bearers
of differing opinions about the world but were the promoters of alternative
forms of life, just as the Indian philosophical systems that were growing up in
the same era, the atheistic ones just as much as the theistic or mystical, were
all aimed at achieving liberation and transcendence. What is less often
understood is that the very project of theoretical knowledge through
mathematics and empirical inquiry was also just as much a practice as Pyrrho’s
skepticism, Plato’s idealism, or Diogenes’ cynicism. What developed from the
speculative activities of the Ionian physicists through the research activities
of the peripatetics and the Alexandrian museum was not based on a universal
human impulse though Aristotle famously claimed that all men naturally desire
to know. The scientific enterprise is an artifact, a cultural creation,
something we chose to value or perhaps don’t.