Description of the World -
Part 54
Mark Martin & Marsha
Porter, DVD & Video Guide 2006 (In the early days of VCRs I came
upon a revolving rack of tapes in a bookstore, immediately thought that it was
wonderful that classic movies were now cheaply available, and then realized
that I really wasn’t all that eager to watch Casablanca again. I’ve had
the same set of reactions to Blockbuster, Netflix, and Amazon Prime. The utopia
of choice quickly becomes another chore and infinite options a desert of
abundance. All Buridan’s ass had to do was flip a coin. It’s not so easy for
us. Maybe I’m complaining because of a personal lack of energy. After all, as
I’ve bragged before, I’m the Don Juan of sloth. Still I can’t be the only one
who’s noticed that consumption work can be as taxing as productive work. On the
other hand, maybe it’s the medium. Movies and plays entrain your attention. The
images are in charge. You’re the boss when you read so the library is less
daunting than the video store. I have the patience to slog through 5,000 pages
of Jonathan Israel while two hours in a movie theater seems like a prison term
even if I like the flick.)
John M. Blunt, Edmund S.
Morgan, Willie Lee Rose, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., Kenneth M. Stamp, C. Vann
Woodward, The National Experience: a history of the United States to 1877,
Part One (I bought this ragged used copy for the election results and maps
in the Appendix—even in 1973 I knew the committee of big names on the title
page had little to do with the contents. From the publisher’s point of view,
what matters in a history textbook is the prestige of the authors. There are
doubtless exceptions—R.R.Palmer’s book comes to mind—but the textbook business
is a low trade.)
William Manchester, The
Last Lion: Winston Spencer Churchill; Alone 1932-1940 (The epigraph to this
volume of the biography is from Macaulay’s Lay of Ancient Rome, the bit
about Horatius at the gate. “To every man upon this earth/Death cometh soon or
late. /And how can man die better/Than facing fearful odds, /For the ashes of
his fathers, /And the temples of his gods?” I once wrote about how this little
jingle with its adolescent idealism may have had a surprising causal role in
making Churchill the man he became—Winston memorized it as a thirteen-year old
for a school declamation exercise and it apparently gave him a lasting taste
for phrase making and declaiming things.)
Wolfgang Leonhard, Child
of the Revolution (I met Leonhard at Yale. He gave some of us grad students
informal lessons in how to read Pravda and just what it betokened when an
opinion piece began “Your Marxism is very good, Comrade, however….” I once
spent a whole night arguing with the President of the Communist Party of
Massachusetts. He was a young man—I don’t remember his name—who had apparently
achieved his position by primogeniture—he was a red diaper baby if there ever were
such a thing. Of course the house he lived in wasn’t exactly Versailles. It
was, in fact, a pigsty whose dirt and clutter offended even my not particularly
rigorous standards of housekeeping. I got the impression that even this low
standard of living was only maintained by Soviet subsidies and the dues paid by
FBI informants. I was very well read on Marxism in those days—I actually taught
a course on contemporary Marxist theory—but I wasn’t a Marxist, a fact that the
President of the Communist Party of Massachusetts just couldn’t accept because
I could speak the language like a native. Our argument, which lasted till dawn,
was about the essential irrelevance of doctrinaire Marxist-Leninism to American
leftists—it was around 1975—and the fellow obviously had trouble with that, no
doubt because it was as obvious to him as it was to me. Nevertheless, I almost
snorted when he finally said, almost in canonical form, “Your Marxism is very
good, however…”)
RĂ©gis Debray, Teachers,
Writers, Celebrities: the intellectuals of Modern France (Debray was
glamorous during the era of romantic leftism, but managed to suffer serial
disillusionment from Castro, Che, Allende, and Mitterrand. He was a slow
learner; Plato didn’t need four tyrants to get the memo and even a 30-year
Bolivian prison sentence didn’t slow Debray down for long—he only served three.
This little book attempts to be simultaneously sociological and clever about
the French intellectual scene—the French have learned how to use statistical
tables in order to be snide. I think Pierre Bourdieu’s Homo Academicus,
which was written by a real sociologist, is more credible on these things,
though just as snide in its own way. Still, Debray has his moments. “But from
the point of view of Playboy and the ads, Kant and Lenin are all one…..From a
distance, these quarrels between two philosophers reveal an identity of culture
rather than an opposition between cultures.” Another good one: “The Atlantic
world lives in the era of the scoop. Atlantic France has manufactured the
ideological scoop.” Those of us who lived through existentialism,
structuralism, post structuralism, and postmodernism will understand that.)
No comments:
Post a Comment